claude-md-improver

Review·Scanned 2/17/2026

This skill audits and updates repository CLAUDE.md files. It runs shell commands such as find . -name "CLAUDE.md" -o -name ".claude.local.md" and can write/update CLAUDE.md and ./.claude.local.md.

by anthropics·v261ce4f·15.2 KB·829 installs
Scanned from main at 261ce4f · Transparency log ↗
$ vett add anthropics/claude-plugins-official/claude-md-improverReview findings below

CLAUDE.md Improver

Audit, evaluate, and improve CLAUDE.md files across a codebase to ensure Claude Code has optimal project context.

This skill can write to CLAUDE.md files. After presenting a quality report and getting user approval, it updates CLAUDE.md files with targeted improvements.

Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery

Find all CLAUDE.md files in the repository:

find . -name "CLAUDE.md" -o -name ".claude.md" -o -name ".claude.local.md" 2>/dev/null | head -50

File Types & Locations:

TypeLocationPurpose
Project root./CLAUDE.mdPrimary project context (checked into git, shared with team)
Local overrides./.claude.local.mdPersonal/local settings (gitignored, not shared)
Global defaults~/.claude/CLAUDE.mdUser-wide defaults across all projects
Package-specific./packages/*/CLAUDE.mdModule-level context in monorepos
SubdirectoryAny nested locationFeature/domain-specific context

Note: Claude auto-discovers CLAUDE.md files in parent directories, making monorepo setups work automatically.

Phase 2: Quality Assessment

For each CLAUDE.md file, evaluate against quality criteria. See references/quality-criteria.md for detailed rubrics.

Quick Assessment Checklist:

CriterionWeightCheck
Commands/workflows documentedHighAre build/test/deploy commands present?
Architecture clarityHighCan Claude understand the codebase structure?
Non-obvious patternsMediumAre gotchas and quirks documented?
ConcisenessMediumNo verbose explanations or obvious info?
CurrencyHighDoes it reflect current codebase state?
ActionabilityHighAre instructions executable, not vague?

Quality Scores:

  • A (90-100): Comprehensive, current, actionable
  • B (70-89): Good coverage, minor gaps
  • C (50-69): Basic info, missing key sections
  • D (30-49): Sparse or outdated
  • F (0-29): Missing or severely outdated

Phase 3: Quality Report Output

ALWAYS output the quality report BEFORE making any updates.

Format:

## CLAUDE.md Quality Report

### Summary
- Files found: X
- Average score: X/100
- Files needing update: X

### File-by-File Assessment

#### 1. ./CLAUDE.md (Project Root)
**Score: XX/100 (Grade: X)**

| Criterion | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Commands/workflows | X/20 | ... |
| Architecture clarity | X/20 | ... |
| Non-obvious patterns | X/15 | ... |
| Conciseness | X/15 | ... |
| Currency | X/15 | ... |
| Actionability | X/15 | ... |

**Issues:**
- [List specific problems]

**Recommended additions:**
- [List what should be added]

#### 2. ./packages/api/CLAUDE.md (Package-specific)
...

Phase 4: Targeted Updates

After outputting the quality report, ask user for confirmation before updating.

Update Guidelines (Critical):

  1. Propose targeted additions only - Focus on genuinely useful info:

    • Commands or workflows discovered during analysis
    • Gotchas or non-obvious patterns found in code
    • Package relationships that weren't clear
    • Testing approaches that work
    • Configuration quirks
  2. Keep it minimal - Avoid:

    • Restating what's obvious from the code
    • Generic best practices already covered
    • One-off fixes unlikely to recur
    • Verbose explanations when a one-liner suffices
  3. Show diffs - For each change, show:

    • Which CLAUDE.md file to update
    • The specific addition (as a diff or quoted block)
    • Brief explanation of why this helps future sessions

Diff Format:

### Update: ./CLAUDE.md

**Why:** Build command was missing, causing confusion about how to run the project.

```diff
+ ## Quick Start
+
+ ```bash
+ npm install
+ npm run dev  # Start development server on port 3000
+ ```

### Phase 5: Apply Updates

After user approval, apply changes using the Edit tool. Preserve existing content structure.

## Templates

See [references/templates.md](references/templates.md) for CLAUDE.md templates by project type.

## Common Issues to Flag

1. **Stale commands**: Build commands that no longer work
2. **Missing dependencies**: Required tools not mentioned
3. **Outdated architecture**: File structure that's changed
4. **Missing environment setup**: Required env vars or config
5. **Broken test commands**: Test scripts that have changed
6. **Undocumented gotchas**: Non-obvious patterns not captured

## User Tips to Share

When presenting recommendations, remind users:

- **`#` key shortcut**: During a Claude session, press `#` to have Claude auto-incorporate learnings into CLAUDE.md
- **Keep it concise**: CLAUDE.md should be human-readable; dense is better than verbose
- **Actionable commands**: All documented commands should be copy-paste ready
- **Use `.claude.local.md`**: For personal preferences not shared with team (add to `.gitignore`)
- **Global defaults**: Put user-wide preferences in `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md`

## What Makes a Great CLAUDE.md

**Key principles:**
- Concise and human-readable
- Actionable commands that can be copy-pasted
- Project-specific patterns, not generic advice
- Non-obvious gotchas and warnings

**Recommended sections** (use only what's relevant):
- Commands (build, test, dev, lint)
- Architecture (directory structure)
- Key Files (entry points, config)
- Code Style (project conventions)
- Environment (required vars, setup)
- Testing (commands, patterns)
- Gotchas (quirks, common mistakes)
- Workflow (when to do what)