High Risk:This skill has significant security concerns. Review the findings below before installing.

technical-blog-writing

Caution·Scanned 2/18/2026

Dangerous skill: downloads and executes a remote installer via curl -fsSL https://cli.inference.sh | sh, enabling arbitrary shell code execution. It is a technical blog-writing guide with CLI examples for infsh image and benchmark generation.

from clawhub.ai·va3718ab·11.9 KB·0 installs
Scanned from 0.1.0 at a3718ab · Transparency log ↗
$ vett add clawhub.ai/okaris/technical-blog-writingReview security findings before installing

Technical Blog Writing

Write developer-focused technical blog posts via inference.sh CLI.

Quick Start

curl -fsSL https://cli.inference.sh | sh && infsh login

# Research topic depth
infsh app run exa/search --input '{
  "query": "building REST API Node.js best practices 2024 tutorial"
}'

# Generate header image
infsh app run infsh/html-to-image --input '{
  "html": "<div style=\"width:1200px;height:630px;background:linear-gradient(135deg,#0f172a,#1e293b);display:flex;align-items:center;padding:60px;font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;color:white\"><div><p style=\"font-size:18px;color:#38bdf8;margin:0\">// engineering blog</p><h1 style=\"font-size:48px;margin:16px 0;font-weight:800;font-family:system-ui;line-height:1.2\">How We Reduced API Latency by 90% with Edge Caching</h1><p style=\"font-size:20px;opacity:0.6;font-family:system-ui\">A deep dive into our CDN architecture</p></div></div>"
}'

Post Types

1. Tutorial / How-To

Step-by-step instruction. The reader should be able to follow along and build something.

Structure:
1. What we're building (with screenshot/demo)
2. Prerequisites
3. Step 1: Setup
4. Step 2: Core implementation
5. Step 3: ...
6. Complete code (GitHub link)
7. Next steps / extensions
RuleWhy
Show the end result firstReader knows if it's worth continuing
List prerequisites explicitlyDon't waste time of wrong audience
Every code block should be runnableCopy-paste-run is the test
Explain the "why" not just the "how"Tutorials that explain reasoning get shared
Include error handlingReal code has errors
Link to complete code repoReference after tutorial

2. Deep Dive / Explainer

Explains a concept, technology, or architecture decision in depth.

Structure:
1. What is [concept] and why should you care?
2. How it works (simplified mental model)
3. How it works (detailed mechanics)
4. Real-world example
5. Trade-offs and when NOT to use it
6. Further reading

3. Postmortem / Incident Report

Describes what went wrong, why, and what was fixed.

Structure:
1. Summary (what happened, impact, duration)
2. Timeline of events
3. Root cause analysis
4. Fix implemented
5. What we're doing to prevent recurrence
6. Lessons learned

4. Benchmark / Comparison

Data-driven comparison of tools, approaches, or architectures.

Structure:
1. What we compared and why
2. Methodology (so results are reproducible)
3. Results with charts/tables
4. Analysis (what the numbers mean)
5. Recommendation (with caveats)
6. Raw data / reproducibility instructions

5. Architecture / System Design

Explains how a system is built and why decisions were made.

Structure:
1. Problem we needed to solve
2. Constraints and requirements
3. Options considered
4. Architecture chosen (with diagram)
5. Trade-offs we accepted
6. Results and lessons

Writing Rules for Developers

Voice and Tone

DoDon't
Be direct: "Use connection pooling""You might want to consider using..."
Admit trade-offs: "This adds complexity"Pretend your solution is perfect
Use "we" for team decisions"I single-handedly architected..."
Specific numbers: "reduced p99 from 800ms to 90ms""significantly improved performance"
Cite sources and benchmarksMake unsourced claims
Acknowledge alternativesPretend yours is the only way

What Developers Hate

❌ "In today's fast-paced world of technology..." (filler)
❌ "As we all know..." (if we all know, why are you writing it?)
❌ "Simply do X" (nothing is simple if you're reading a tutorial)
❌ "It's easy to..." (dismissive of reader's experience)
❌ "Obviously..." (if it's obvious, don't write it)
❌ Marketing language in technical content
❌ Burying the lede under 3 paragraphs of context

Code Examples

RuleWhy
Every code block must be runnableBroken examples destroy trust
Show complete, working examplesSnippets without context are useless
Include language identifier in fenced blocksSyntax highlighting
Show output/result after codeReader verifies understanding
Use realistic variable namescalculateTotalRevenue not foo
Include error handling in examplesReal code handles errors
Pin dependency versions"Works with React 18.2" not "React"
Good code block format:

```python
# What this code does (one line)
def calculate_retry_delay(attempt: int, base_delay: float = 1.0) -> float:
    """Exponential backoff with jitter."""
    delay = base_delay * (2 ** attempt)
    jitter = random.uniform(0, delay * 0.1)
    return delay + jitter

# Usage
delay = calculate_retry_delay(attempt=3)  # ~8.0-8.8 seconds

### Explanation Depth

| Audience Signal | Depth |
|----------------|-------|
| "Getting started with X" | Explain everything, assume no prior knowledge |
| "Advanced X patterns" | Skip basics, go deep on nuances |
| "X vs Y" | Assume familiarity with both, focus on differences |
| "How we built X" | Technical audience, can skip fundamentals |

**State your assumed audience level explicitly** at the start:

"This post assumes familiarity with Docker and basic Kubernetes concepts. If you're new to containers, start with [our intro post]."


## Blog Post Structure

### The Ideal Structure

```markdown
# Title (contains primary keyword, states outcome)

[Hero image or diagram]

**TL;DR:** [2-3 sentence summary with key takeaway]

## The Problem / Why This Matters
[Set up why the reader should care — specific, not generic]

## The Solution / How We Did It
[Core content — code, architecture, explanation]

### Step 1: [First thing]
[Explanation + code + output]

### Step 2: [Second thing]
[Explanation + code + output]

## Results
[Numbers, benchmarks, outcomes — be specific]

## Trade-offs and Limitations
[Honest about downsides — builds trust]

## Conclusion
[Key takeaway + what to do next]

## Further Reading
[3-5 relevant links]

Word Count by Type

TypeWord CountWhy
Quick tip500-800One concept, one example
Tutorial1,500-3,000Step-by-step needs detail
Deep dive2,000-4,000Thorough exploration
Architecture post2,000-3,500Diagrams carry some load
Benchmark1,500-2,500Data and charts do heavy lifting

Diagrams and Visuals

When to Use Diagrams

ScenarioDiagram Type
Request flowSequence diagram
System architectureBox-and-arrow diagram
Decision logicFlowchart
Data modelER diagram
Performance comparisonBar/line chart
Before/afterSide-by-side
# Generate architecture diagram
infsh app run infsh/html-to-image --input '{
  "html": "<div style=\"width:1200px;height:600px;background:#0f172a;display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:center;padding:40px;font-family:system-ui;color:white\"><div style=\"display:flex;gap:40px;align-items:center\"><div style=\"background:#1e293b;border:2px solid #334155;border-radius:8px;padding:24px;text-align:center;width:160px\"><p style=\"font-size:14px;color:#94a3b8;margin:0\">Client</p><p style=\"font-size:18px;font-weight:bold;margin:8px 0 0\">React App</p></div><div style=\"color:#64748b;font-size:32px\">→</div><div style=\"background:#1e293b;border:2px solid #3b82f6;border-radius:8px;padding:24px;text-align:center;width:160px\"><p style=\"font-size:14px;color:#94a3b8;margin:0\">Edge</p><p style=\"font-size:18px;font-weight:bold;margin:8px 0 0\">CDN Cache</p></div><div style=\"color:#64748b;font-size:32px\">→</div><div style=\"background:#1e293b;border:2px solid #334155;border-radius:8px;padding:24px;text-align:center;width:160px\"><p style=\"font-size:14px;color:#94a3b8;margin:0\">API</p><p style=\"font-size:18px;font-weight:bold;margin:8px 0 0\">Node.js</p></div><div style=\"color:#64748b;font-size:32px\">→</div><div style=\"background:#1e293b;border:2px solid #334155;border-radius:8px;padding:24px;text-align:center;width:160px\"><p style=\"font-size:14px;color:#94a3b8;margin:0\">Database</p><p style=\"font-size:18px;font-weight:bold;margin:8px 0 0\">PostgreSQL</p></div></div></div>"
}'

# Generate benchmark chart
infsh app run infsh/python-executor --input '{
  "code": "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\nimport matplotlib\nmatplotlib.use(\"Agg\")\n\nfig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 6))\nfig.patch.set_facecolor(\"#0f172a\")\nax.set_facecolor(\"#0f172a\")\n\ntools = [\"Express\", \"Fastify\", \"Hono\", \"Elysia\"]\nrps = [15000, 45000, 62000, 78000]\ncolors = [\"#64748b\", \"#64748b\", \"#3b82f6\", \"#64748b\"]\n\nax.barh(tools, rps, color=colors, height=0.5)\nfor i, v in enumerate(rps):\n    ax.text(v + 1000, i, f\"{v:,} req/s\", va=\"center\", color=\"white\", fontsize=14)\n\nax.set_xlabel(\"Requests per second\", color=\"white\", fontsize=14)\nax.set_title(\"HTTP Framework Benchmark (Hello World)\", color=\"white\", fontsize=18, fontweight=\"bold\")\nax.tick_params(colors=\"white\", labelsize=12)\nax.spines[\"top\"].set_visible(False)\nax.spines[\"right\"].set_visible(False)\nax.spines[\"bottom\"].set_color(\"#334155\")\nax.spines[\"left\"].set_color(\"#334155\")\nplt.tight_layout()\nplt.savefig(\"benchmark.png\", dpi=150, facecolor=\"#0f172a\")\nprint(\"Saved\")"
}'

Distribution

Where Developers Read

PlatformFormatHow to Post
Your blogFull articlePrimary — own your content
Dev.toCross-post (canonical URL back to yours)Markdown import
HashnodeCross-post (canonical URL)Markdown import
Hacker NewsLink submissionShow HN for projects, tell HN for stories
Reddit (r/programming, r/webdev, etc.)Link or discussionFollow subreddit rules
Twitter/XThread summary + linkSee twitter-thread-creation skill
LinkedInAdapted version + linkSee linkedin-content skill
# Cross-post thread to X
infsh app run x/post-create --input '{
  "text": "New blog post: How We Reduced API Latency by 90%\n\nThe short version:\n→ Moved computation to edge\n→ Aggressive cache-control headers\n→ Eliminated N+1 queries\n\np99 went from 800ms to 90ms.\n\nFull deep dive with code: [link]"
}'

Common Mistakes

MistakeProblemFix
No TL;DRBusy devs leave before getting the point2-3 sentence summary at the top
Broken code examplesDestroys all credibilityTest every code block before publishing
No version pinningCode breaks in 6 months"Works with Node 20, React 18.2"
"Simply do X"Dismissive, condescendingRemove "simply", "just", "easily"
No diagrams for architectureWalls of text describing systemsOne diagram > 500 words of description
Marketing toneDevelopers instantly disengageDirect, technical, honest
No trade-offs sectionReads as biased marketingAlways discuss downsides
Giant introduction before contentReaders bounceGet to the point in 2-3 paragraphs
Unpinned dependenciesTutorial breaks for future readersPin versions, note date written
No "Further Reading"Dead end, no context3-5 links to deepen understanding

Related Skills

npx skills add inferencesh/skills@seo-content-brief
npx skills add inferencesh/skills@content-repurposing
npx skills add inferencesh/skills@og-image-design

Browse all apps: infsh app list